WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Former Trump adviser and ambassadors met with Netanyahu as Gaza war strains US
Massachusetts Senate weighs tuition
Vermont governor vetoes bill to restrict pesticide that is toxic to bees, saying it's anti
What to watch in Tueday's Maryland US Senate primaries
Ricky Rudd, Carl Edwards and Ralph Moody selected to NASCAR Hall of Fame Class of 2025
Bridgerton fans SLAM season three's historical beauty inaccuracies
Thousands of fans come to see Nadal practice ahead of the French Open
Time's up after 3 hours as NFL limits interviews for coaches still busy in playoffs
Slovak Parliament votes to condemn political violence after assassination attempt on prime minister
Stanford holds on to beat Arizona State 8
Cincinnati Bengals plan to spend up to $120 million to for improvements to Paycor Stadium
What to watch in Tueday's Maryland US Senate primaries